A general schema for bilateral proof rules
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A Gentzen-type calculus of sequents for single-operator propositional logic
- A judgmental reconstruction of modal logic
- A nonmonotonic sequent calculus for inferentialist expressivists
- A UNIFYING PRINCIPAL IN QUANTIFICATION THEORY
- Bilateral inversion principles
- Bilateralism in proof-theoretic semantics
- Classical harmony and separability
- Cut elimination and normalization for generalized single and multi-conclusion sequent and natural deduction calculi
- EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC
- Falsification, natural deduction and bi-intuitionistic logic
- Harmony and Normalisation in Bilateral Logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3504935 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1497485 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 777292 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7599931 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3261581 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3274715 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7594147 (Why is no real title available?)
- Natural deduction for the Sheffer stroke and Peirce's arrow (and any other truth-functional connective)
- On cut elimination in the presence of perice rule
- Proof and falsity. A logical investigation
- Proof methods for modal and intuitionistic logics
- Proof-theoretic semantics
- Rejection
- Sequents and trees. An introduction to the theory and applications of propositional sequent calculi
- Some comments on Ian Rumfitt's bilateralism
- Speech acts, categoricity, and the meanings of logical connectives
- Structural proof theory. With an appendix by Aarne Ranta
- Supposition: A Problem for Bilateralism
- The categoricity problem and truth-value gaps
- The Two-Valued Iterative Systems of Mathematical Logic. (AM-5)
- Uniqueness of logical connectives in a bilateralist setting
- What is Logic?
- Why conclusions should remain single
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: A general schema for bilateral proof rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6544534)