A generalisation of the functional approach to compactness
categorical closure operatorcategorical topologyclosed morphismscompactcountably compactLindelöfpseudocompactquasi-perfect maps
Epimorphisms, monomorphisms, special classes of morphisms, null morphisms (18A20) Topological spaces and generalizations (closure spaces, etc.) (54A05) Categorical methods in general topology (54B30) Special maps on topological spaces (open, closed, perfect, etc.) (54C10) Noncompact covering properties (paracompact, Lindelöf, etc.) (54D20) Compactness (54D30)
This paper concerns a categorical theory of compactness, closed maps and certain related notions motivated by the well-known result: a space \(X\) is compact iff the projection \(\pi_Y:X\times Y\rightarrow Y\) maps closed sets in \(X\times Y\) to closed sets in \(Y\), for any space \(Y\). The author introduces a categorical notion of closure operator \(\alpha\) on a category \(\mathcal C\) with respect to \(\mathcal M\) a class of monomorphisms, and employs a functional approach to general topology. The author states that he pursues the following generalization of the above result: A space \(X\) is compact iff for any space Y, every \(\alpha\)-closed subspace \(M\subset X\times Y\) is projected to a \(\beta\)-closed subspace \(\pi_Y(M)\) of \(Y\), where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are different closure operators. This permits the inclusion of ``asymmetric compactness properties into the categorical theory. The resulting theory is akin to that of \textit{E. Giuli} [General topology and applications, Proc. 5th Northeast Conf., New York/NY (USA) 1989, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 134, 73--92 (1991; Zbl 0771.54010)], \textit{E. Giuli} and \textit{M. Hušek} [Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., VII. Ser., B 11, No.~3, 605--621 (1997; Zbl 0887.54012)], and \textit{N. Noble} [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 140, 381--391 (1969; Zbl 0192.59701) and ibid. 160, 169--183 (1971; Zbl 0233.54004)].
- A categorical guide to separation, compactness and perfectness
- Compact Hausdorff objects
- Factorizations, denseness, separation, and relatively compact objects
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1002289 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4156719 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 125727 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1076174 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2068085 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 195102 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 832997 (Why is no real title available?)
- Products with Closed Projections
- Products with Closed Projections. II
- An internal characterization of sets of functions determining minimal compactifications
- Function spaces and contractive extensions in approach theory: the role of regularity
- Sequences and related closure and compactness properties in frames
- Open maps, colimits, and a convenient category of fibre spaces
- Monads in topology
- Determination of compact subsets from functionals on them
- Compactification and Closure
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4156719 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3967415 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4040808 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 55421 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 125727 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1247773 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2019832 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2068085 (Why is no real title available?)
- A categorical approach to absolute closure
This page was built for publication: A generalisation of the functional approach to compactness
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2390515)