A practical forgery attack on Lilliput-AE

DOI10.1007/S00145-019-09333-ZMaRDI QIDQ2188961zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Orr Dunkelman, Nathan Keller, Eran Lambooij, Yu Sasaki

Publication date 15 June 2020

Published in Journal of Cryptology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00145-019-09333-z

zbMATH Keywords

authenticated encryptioncryptanalysisdifferential cryptanalysisLilliput

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cryptography (94A60) Authentication, digital signatures and secret sharing (94A62)

Recommendations

• Forgery attacks on FlexAE and FlexAEAD
• Practical key recovery attacks on FlexAEAD
• Practical forgeries for ORANGE
• Cryptanalysis of the AEAD and hash algorithm DryGASCON
• New differential bounds and division property of Lilliput: block cipher with extended generalized Feistel network

Cites work

• Block ciphers that are easier to mask: how far can we go?
• Extended Generalized Feistel Networks Using Matrix Representation to Propose a New Lightweight Block Cipher: <sc>Lilliput</sc>
• Fast Software Encryption
• Tight Bounds of Differentially and Linearly Active S-Boxes and Division Property of Lilliput

Cited in

(6)

• Lightweight authenticated encryption mode suitable for threshold implementation
• Forgery attacks on FlexAE and FlexAEAD
• Differential Forgery Attack Against LAC
• Forgery Attacks on Round-Reduced ICEPOLE-128
• Mind the \texttt{TWEAKEY} schedule: cryptanalysis on \texttt{SKINNYe-64-256}
• Practical forgeries for ORANGE

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Lilliput

This page was built for publication: A practical forgery attack on Lilliput-AE

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2188961)