A resolution framework for finitely-valued first-order logics
The authors outline a theoretical foundation for the introduction, analysis and implementation of resolution proof systems for finitely- valued first-order logics (FFO logics). They base their approach on the unification of the algebraic theories of logical systems and non-clausal resolution. Thus rich algebraic techniques should be at hand to express and investigate metatheoretical properties of resolution proof systems for FFO logics. First the notion of a resolution proof system for a first-order logic is introduced that generalizes the concept of a non-clausal resolution proof system for a propositional logic elaborated by the authors elsewhere and the resolution proof system for classical predicate logic developed by Manna and Waldinger. The proof that every FFO logics can be formalized as a resolution proof system entails the effective constructability of FFO resolution counterparts from the semantic descriptions of these logics. This sets the stage for an automated generation of theorem proving environments for FFO logics. At last two speed-up techniques, the set-of-support strategy and the polarity strategy, are examined to render the theorem proving system more effective. These techniques are to direct and restrict the application of the inference rules. It is demonstrated that both strategies preserve the refutational completeness of resolution proof systems.
- Completely non-clausal theorem proving
- Complexity and related enhancements for automated theorem-proving programs
- Efficiency and Completeness of the Set of Support Strategy in Theorem Proving
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4018413 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3648682 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3150809 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4157911 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3941499 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4049622 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4055570 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4057054 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4066840 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 15392 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 41806 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48155 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3547260 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3627135 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 475244 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3219316 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3392404 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4182873 (Why is no real title available?)
- On products of structures for generalized logics
- Special relations in automated deduction
- The recursive resolution method for modal logic
- Theory of logical calculi. Basic theory of consequence operations
This page was built for publication: A resolution framework for finitely-valued first-order logics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1185455)