A strategy for assessing closure

DOI10.1007/S10670-006-9009-YMaRDI QIDQ885006zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Peter Murphy

Publication date 7 June 2007

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-006-9009-y

zbMATH Keywords

BruecknerdefeatersDretskeepistemic closure principlereliabilismsafetysensitivitytransmission principleWarfield

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Williamson, closure, and KK
• Why safety doesn't save closure
• When does epistemic closure fail?
• Towards closure on closure
• The knower paradox and epistemic closure

Cites work

• Counterfactuals and comparative possibility
• When epistemic closure does and does not fail: a lesson from the history of epistemology

Cited in

(7)

• Epistemic closure and epistemic logic. I: Relevant alternatives and subjunctivism
• Transmission arguments against knowledge closure are still fallacious
• Williamson, closure, and KK
• Closure Policy when Bank Inspection Can Be Manipulated *
• Knowledge is closed under analytic content
• Getting a little closure for closure
• How to safely close a discussion

This page was built for publication: A strategy for assessing closure

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q885006)