Accounting for nonmonotone missing data using inverse probability weighting

DOI10.1002/SIM.9860MaRDI QIDQ6626960zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Rachael K. Ross, Stephen R. Cole, Jessie K. Edwards, Daniel J. Westreich, Julie L. Daniels, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer

Publication date 29 October 2024

Published in Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.9860

zbMATH Keywords

imputationmissing datanonmonotonesimulationweighting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites work

• A potential for bias when rounding in multiple imputation
• Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy
• Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors Are Not Always Observed
• Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
• Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation From Simple Random Samples With Ignorable Nonresponse
• Multiple imputation: a review of practical and theoretical findings
• On Inverse Probability Weighting for Nonmonotone Missing at Random Data
• Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods

Cited in

(1)

• Handling Missingness, Failures, and Non-Convergence in Simulation Studies: A Review of Current Practices and Recommendations

This page was built for publication: Accounting for nonmonotone missing data using inverse probability weighting

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6626960)