Aggregating Judgements by Merging Evidence

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXN011MaRDI QIDQ3632764zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jon Williamson

Publication date 12 June 2009

Published in Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://semanticscholar.org/paper/f68c4fe90cb75ef3c72e40fe09b44d72db020fe1

zbMATH Keywords

belief mergingbelief revisiondecision theoryjudgement aggregationmaximum entropyobjective Bayesianism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Decision theory (91B06) Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision
• Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• The epistemic view of belief merging: can we track the truth?
• Belief merging and judgment aggregation in fuzzy setting

Cited in

(4)

• Aggregating evidence using quantified statements
• Belief merging with the aim of truthlikeness
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6262643 (Why is no real title available?)
• Discovering maximum entropy knowledge

This page was built for publication: Aggregating Judgements by Merging Evidence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3632764)