Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(23)- Analysis of the Talmudic argumentum a fortiori inference rule (Kal Vachomer) using matrix abduction
- Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting
- A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement
- A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
- Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
- Convex combinations in judgment aggregation
- Improving judgment reliability in social networks via jury theorems
- Voting rules as statistical estimators
- The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Principles of Talmudic logic
- Aggregating Judgements by Merging Evidence
- A Complete Conclusion-Based Procedure for Judgment Aggregation
- Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- Iterative judgment aggregation
- The discursive dilemma in monetary policy
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- A plea for the majority method in aggregating judgements
- How to reach legitimate decisions when the procedure is controversial
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Justifiable group choice
This page was built for publication: Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3553923)
