A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement

DOI10.1007/S10670-015-9800-8zbMATH Open1408.91034OpenAlexW104028564WikidataQ59478754 ScholiaQ59478754MaRDI QIDQ1706763FDOQ1706763

Authors: Remco Heesen, Pieter van der Kolk 

Publication date: 28 March 2018

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9800-8

Recommendations

• Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement
• An optimality-argument for equal weighting
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting
• Disagreement and evidential attenuation
• Agreeing to disagree: the non-probabilistic case

zbMATH Keywords

rationalityepistemologygame-theoretic modelconciliatory viewpeer disagreementsteadfast view

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26)

Cites Work

• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning
• Dr. Truthlove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Bayesian Probabilities*
• Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
• Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
• Reaching a Consensus
• Agreeing to disagree
• We can't disagree forever
• A reason-based theory of rational choice
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement
• Disagreement and evidential attenuation

Cited In (5)

• Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement
• ``Agreeing to disagree type results: a decision-theoretic approach.
• Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
• Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective
• Peer disagreement and independence preservation

This page was built for publication: A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1706763)