Peer disagreement and independence preservation

DOI10.1007/S10670-010-9256-9zbMATH Open1217.03018OpenAlexW2048747432MaRDI QIDQ535392FDOQ535392

Authors: Carl G. Wagner 

Publication date: 11 May 2011

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5024/1/PD_and_IP%2C_complete_with_ref..doc

File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)

Recommendations

• A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement
• Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
• Group decision-making in the shadow of disagreement
• Self-control in peer groups
• Disagreement and epistemic utility-based compromise
• Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective

zbMATH Keywords

epistemic peersprobability pooling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cites Work

• Social choice and individual values
• Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
• Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
• Aggregating subjective probabilities: Some limitative theorems
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Steady magnetohydrodynamic flow of an incompressible viscous fluid involving an ignorable co-ordinate
• Updating Subjective Probability
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Probability amalgamation and the independence issue: A reply to Laddaga
• A functional equation arising in multi-agent statistical decision theory
• Allocation, Lehrer models, and the consensus of probabilities
• Lehrer and the consensus proposal
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (7)

• Recalcitrance in groups
• Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
• Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
• Independence preservation in expert judgment synthesis
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting
• An impossibility theorem for allocation aggregation
• Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree

This page was built for publication: Peer disagreement and independence preservation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q535392)