Peer disagreement and independence preservation

DOI10.1007/S10670-010-9256-9MaRDI QIDQ535392zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Carl G. Wagner

Publication date 11 May 2011

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5024/1/PD_and_IP%2C_complete_with_ref..doc

IPFS File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)

zbMATH Keywords

epistemic peersprobability pooling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Recommendations

• A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement
• Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
• Group decision-making in the shadow of disagreement
• Self-control in peer groups
• Disagreement and epistemic utility-based compromise
• Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3978224 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4060777 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3737329 (Why is no real title available?)
• A functional equation arising in multi-agent statistical decision theory
• Aggregating subjective probabilities: Some limitative theorems
• Allocation, Lehrer models, and the consensus of probabilities
• Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
• Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
• Lehrer and the consensus proposal
• Probability amalgamation and the independence issue: A reply to Laddaga
• Social choice and individual values
• Steady magnetohydrodynamic flow of an incompressible viscous fluid involving an ignorable co-ordinate
• Updating Subjective Probability

Cited in

(7)

• Recalcitrance in groups
• Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
• Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
• Independence preservation in expert judgment synthesis
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting
• An impossibility theorem for allocation aggregation
• Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree

This page was built for publication: Peer disagreement and independence preservation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q535392)