Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12143zbMATH Open1436.03085OpenAlexW2403427262MaRDI QIDQ4623342FDOQ4623342

Authors: Lee Elkin, Gregory Wheeler 

Publication date: 15 February 2019

Published in: Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-29517-4

Recommendations

• A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement
• Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement
• Disagreement and evidential attenuation
• Peer disagreement and independence preservation
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05) Fuzzy probability (60A86)

Cited In (10)

• Tracking probabilistic truths: a logic for statistical learning
• Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures
• A gentle approach to imprecise probability
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Peer disagreement and independence preservation
• Higher-order evidence and losing one's conviction
• Distention for Sets of Probabilities
• Aggregation of experts' opinions and conditional consensus opinion by the Steiner point
• The joint aggregation of beliefs and degrees of belief
• Learning and pooling, pooling and learning

This page was built for publication: Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4623342)