Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12143MaRDI QIDQ4623342zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Lee Elkin, Gregory Wheeler

Publication date 15 February 2019

Published in Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-29517-4

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05) Fuzzy probability (60A86)

Recommendations

• A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement
• Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement
• Disagreement and evidential attenuation
• Peer disagreement and independence preservation
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting

Cited in

(13)

• Learning and pooling, pooling and learning
• Aggregation of experts' opinions and conditional consensus opinion by the Steiner point
• The joint aggregation of beliefs and degrees of belief
• Learning probabilities: towards a logic of statistical learning
• Peer disagreement and independence preservation
• Distention for Sets of Probabilities
• Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures
• Tracking probabilistic truths: a logic for statistical learning
• Higher-order evidence and losing one's conviction
• A gentle approach to imprecise probability
• (Almost) all evidence is higher-order evidence
• Another approach to consensus and maximally informed opinions with increasing evidence
• Radical pooling and imprecise probabilities

This page was built for publication: Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4623342)