Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6042997
Recommendations
- Measuring inconsistency with many-valued logics
- Modelling inexact utility theory in a multi-valued logic of approximation
- Agreeing to disagree in probabilistic dynamic epistemic~logic
- Measurement-theoretic foundation of preference-based dyadic deontic logic
- Reasoning with propositions having imprecise truth values
- Multivalued logics for conflicting norms
- Aggregation in value-based argumentation frameworks
- On the logic of ``agreeing to disagree type results
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Reasoning about ignorance and contradiction: many-valued logics versus epistemic logic
Cites work
- An essay in the formal theory of extension and of intension
- An exact truthmaker semantics for permission and obligation
- Angellic content
- Deontic modals and hyperintensionality
- HYPE: a system of hyperintensional logic (with an application to semantic paradoxes)
- Hyperintensional logic
- Operators and Laws for Combining Preference Relations
- Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
- Use and applications of non-additive measures and integrals
- Utility Theory without the Completeness Axiom
This page was built for publication: Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6042997)