Arguing with valued preference relations

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_6MaRDI QIDQ3011935zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Souhila Kaci, Christophe Labreuche

Publication date 29 June 2011

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_6

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
• Weighted argumentation
• Representing synergy among arguments with Choquet integral
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 700081 (Why is no real title available?)
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
• Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks

Cited in

(8)

• Representing synergy among arguments with Choquet integral
• Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
• Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures
• Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
• Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
• A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
• A relaxation of internal conflict and defence in weighted argumentation frameworks
• Weighted argumentation

This page was built for publication: Arguing with valued preference relations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3011935)