Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.009zbMath1452.68188arXiv1707.09324OpenAlexW2742131233MaRDI QIDQ1726415

Anthony Hunter, Sylwia Polberg

Publication date: 20 February 2019

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09324

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationprobabilistic argumentationdialogical argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (12)

Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory ⋮ Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks ⋮ Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules ⋮ Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation ⋮ Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation ⋮ Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities ⋮ Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks ⋮ Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling ⋮ Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments ⋮ Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics ⋮ On searching explanatory argumentation graphs

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A logical account of formal argumentation
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
• TOWARD A COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBABILISTIC ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS
• An Axiomatic Approach to Support in Argumentation
• Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework
• Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
• On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Arguing with Valued Preference Relations
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• Belief in Attacks in Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation
• Probabilistic Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Inference from Controversial Arguments
• Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches