Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2303513
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2020.103236zbMath1435.68316arXiv1802.07489OpenAlexW2788809090WikidataQ126379609 ScholiaQ126379609MaRDI QIDQ2303513
Sylwia Polberg, Matthias Thimm, Anthony Hunter
Publication date: 4 March 2020
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07489
Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Knowledge representation (68T30) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)
Related Items
Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation ⋮ A filtering-based general approach to learning rational constraints of epistemic graphs ⋮ Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling ⋮ A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On precise and correct qualitative probabilistic inference
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Updating probabilistic epistemic states in persuasion dialogues
- Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework
- Instantiating Knowledge Bases in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
- Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
- On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- A Relevance-theoretic Framework for Constructing and Deconstructing Enthymemes
- Belief in Attacks in Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation
- Epistemic Attack Semantics.
- Inference from Controversial Arguments
- Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
