Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5094045
DOI10.1613/JAIR.1.13530OpenAlexW4283579494MaRDI QIDQ5094045FDOQ5094045
Authors: Nikolai Käfer, Martin Diller, Clemens Dubslaff, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Holger Hermanns, Christel Baier
Publication date: 2 August 2022
Published in: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13530
Recommendations
Cites Work
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)
- On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Semi-stable semantics
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Computational models of argument (COMMA 2010). Proceedings of 3rd conference, Desanzano del Garda, Italy, September 2010.
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Probabilistic Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
- On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics
- Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- Probabilities on extensions in abstract argumentation
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
Cited In (1)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5094045)