An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1726407
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3560737 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6970794 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6292806 (Why is no real title available?)
- A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation
- A study of argument acceptability dynamics through core and remainder sets
- A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks
- An axiomatic approach to support in argumentation
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
- Argument revision
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)
- Belief revision and update: Complexity of model checking
- Belief revision in Horn theories
- Bounded Query Classes
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Credibility limited revision
- Credibility-based selective revision by deductive argumentation
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Dynamics of knowledge in \textsc{DeLP} through argument theory change
- Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
- Inconsistent-tolerant base revision through argument theory change
- Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states
- Logic based merging
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals
- On the logic of iterated belief revision
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change
- Rewriting rules for the computation of goal-oriented changes in an argumentation system
- Semi-revision
- Semi-stable semantics
- Splitting an Argumentation Framework
- Synthesizing argumentation frameworks from examples
- The complexity of logic-based abduction
- What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
Cited in
(28)- Epistemic argumentation framework: theory and computation
- Metalogical contributions to the nonmonotonic theory of abstract argumentation
- Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
- Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
- Argument revision
- Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
- A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation
- Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)
- Balancing rationality and utility in logic-based argumentation with classical logic sentences and belief contraction
- Structural constraints for dynamic operators in abstract argumentation
- Inconsistent-tolerant base revision through argument theory change
- Dynamic collective argumentation: constructing the revision and contraction operators
- Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
- Towards the proof-theoretic unification of Dung's argumentation framework: an adaptive logic approach
- A logical encoding for \(k\)-\(m\)-realization of extensions in abstract argumentation
- Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
- Evidence-based argumentation and its incremental semantics
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- Belief revision and argumentation: a reasoning process view
- A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks
- Preference-based extension enforcement in argumentation
- Revision, defeasible conditionals and non-monotonic inference for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Structured argumentation dynamics. Undermining attacks in default justification logic
- Revising non-monotonic theories with sufficient and necessary conditions: the case of defeasible logic
- Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1726407)
