Splitting an Argumentation Framework
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3003241
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_6zbMATH Open1327.68240OpenAlexW1582550348MaRDI QIDQ3003241FDOQ3003241
Publication date: 26 May 2011
Published in: Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_6
Cited In (24)
- Equivalence in argumentation frameworks with a claim-centric view: classical results with novel ingredients
- A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
- Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach
- Lattice point of view for argumentation framework
- On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics
- Incremental Computation of Deterministic Extensions for Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks
- Open Problems in Abstract Argumentation
- Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility
- Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory
- Constrained derivation in assumption-based argumentation
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- I donโt care, I donโt know โฆ I know too much! On Incompleteness and Undecidedness in Abstract Argumentation
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
- Towards a general theory of decomposability in abstract argumentation
- How to split a logic program
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
Recommendations
This page was built for publication: Splitting an Argumentation Framework
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3003241)