Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2163881
Recommendations
- New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation
- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- The hidden power of abstract argumentation semantics
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation
- Guaranteeing Admissibility of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Rationality and Feasibility Constraints
- Towards a general theory of decomposability in abstract argumentation
- Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation
Cites work
- A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- A Principle-Based Analysis of Weakly Admissible Semantics
- Abductive Logic Programming
- An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalisms
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks
- Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation
- Explaining non-acceptability in abstract argumentation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1884383 (Why is no real title available?)
- If nothing is accepted -- repairing argumentation frameworks
- Infinite argumentation frameworks. On the existence and uniqueness of extensions
- Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning
- New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation
- Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation
- Preprocessing argumentation frameworks via replacement patterns
- Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard --- On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Splitting an Argumentation Framework
- Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
- Strong and uniform equivalence of nonmonotonic theories -- an algebraic approach
- Strong explanations for nonmonotonic reasoning
- Strongly equivalent logic programs
- The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited
- The equivalence zoo for Dung-style semantics
- The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions
- Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
- Using graph convolutional networks for approximate reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks: a feasibility study
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
Cited in
(10)- Modal provability foundations for argumentation networks
- Static and dynamic orderings on Dungean argumentation frameworks -- an overview
- Weak argumentation semantics and unsafe odd cycles: results and a conjecture
- Defining defense and defeat in abstract argumentation from scratch -- A generalizing approach
- \(\mathrm{AL}^+\): extended argumentation logic
- Aripoter: solvers for approximate reasoning based on grounded semantics
- On the paraconsistency of argumentation logic
- On the realisability of weak argumentation semantics
- Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
- On generalized notions of consistency and reinstatement and their preservation in formal argumentation
This page was built for publication: Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2163881)
