A Principle-Based Analysis of Weakly Admissible Semantics

DOI10.3233/FAIA200502zbMATH Open1464.68352OpenAlexW3137690603MaRDI QIDQ5145809FDOQ5145809

Tjitze Rienstra, Jérémie Dauphin, Leendert van der Torre

Publication date: 21 January 2021

Full work available at URL: https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/55368

zbMATH Keywords

formal argumentationabstract argumentationweak admissibilityprinciple-based analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cited In (5)

• Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility
• New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation
• On restricting the impact of self-attacking arguments in gradual semantics
• The choice-preferred semantics for relevance-oriented acceptance of admissible sets of arguments
• Weak argumentation semantics and unsafe odd cycles: results and a conjecture

Recommendations

• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• WEAK DISHARMONY: SOME LESSONS FOR PROOF-THEORETIC SEMANTICS 👍 👎
• A nondeterministic well-founded semantics 👍 👎
• A reinterpretation of the semilattice semantics with applications 👍 👎
• A Semantics for In-Principle Provability 👍 👎
• Semantical analysis of weak Kleene logics 👍 👎
• Stability of weak second-order semantics 👍 👎
• Weakest relative precondition semantics. Balancing approved theory and realistic translation verification 👍 👎
• Correction 👍 👎
• New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: A Principle-Based Analysis of Weakly Admissible Semantics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5145809)