scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4585837

zbMath1395.03005MaRDI QIDQ4585837

No author found.

Publication date: 10 September 2018

Full work available at URL: http://formalargumentation.org/

Title: zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.



Related Items (36)

An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalismsThe degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentationConstrained incomplete argumentation frameworksGeneralizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworksShedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibilityArgument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rulesLogic Programming, Argumentation and Human ReasoningHarnessing Incremental Answer Set Solving for Reasoning in Assumption-Based ArgumentationA claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressivenessBelief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparisonParameterized Complexity of Logic-based Argumentation in Schaefer’s FrameworkIntegrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analysesLogical argumentation by dynamic proof systemsA postulate-driven study of logical argumentationOn incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressivenessA logical encoding for \(k\)-\(m\)-realization of extensions in abstract argumentationTopological conditions and solutions for repairing argumentation frameworksAudience irrelevance in strategic argumentation gamesRepresenting abstract dialectical frameworks with binary decision diagramsThe burden of persuasion in abstract argumentationExtension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworksInconsistency MeasurementUsing Graph Convolutional Networks for Approximate Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Feasibility StudyStructural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint AcceptabilityArgumentative explanations for interactive recommendationsComputational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilitiesRealizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworksHow we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attainedA Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLPA review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistencyEMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interfaceProbabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary reportOn the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentationA general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentationParaconsistent inference relations induced from inconsistency measuresTowards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence




This page was built for publication: