scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4585837
Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Collections of articles of miscellaneous specific interest (00B15) Proceedings, conferences, collections, etc. pertaining to mathematical logic and foundations (03-06) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic in computer science (03B70)
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7572560
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Logic-based approaches to formal argumentation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1814755
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- A formal concept view of abstract argumentation
- Foundations for a logic of arguments
- Handbook of modal logic
Cited in
(74)- Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report
- Paraconsistent inference relations induced from inconsistency measures
- An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalisms
- The degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentation
- Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility
- Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- EMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interface
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules
- Representing abstract dialectical frameworks with binary decision diagrams
- The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1814755 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inconsistency measurement
- Using graph convolutional networks for approximate reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks: a feasibility study
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
- A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7599964 (Why is no real title available?)
- Logic Programming, Argumentation and Human Reasoning
- Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
- Harnessing Incremental Answer Set Solving for Reasoning in Assumption-Based Argumentation
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
- Parameterized Complexity of Logic-based Argumentation in Schaefer’s Framework
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness
- A logical encoding for \(k\)-\(m\)-realization of extensions in abstract argumentation
- Topological conditions and solutions for repairing argumentation frameworks
- Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
- On dynamics in structured argumentation formalisms
- The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation
- Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
- Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
- Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- An equivalence class of gradual semantics
- On naive labellings -- realizability, construction and patterns of redundancy
- How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation
- An awareness epistemic framework for belief, argumentation and their dynamics
- Defining defense and defeat in abstract argumentation from scratch -- A generalizing approach
- Hypothesis-driven disjunctive reasoning in logical argumentation
- Aripoter: solvers for approximate reasoning based on grounded semantics
- The A-BDI metamodel for human-level AI. Argumentation as balancing, dialogue and inference
- Incomplete higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks
- Axiomatics of restricted choices by linear orders of sets with minimum as fallback
- Dual scale detachment
- Completing structured arguments in assumption-based argumentation
- On the sensitivity of extension semantics to similarity
- Constraints and lifting-based (conditional) preferences in abstract argumentation
- On the realisability of weak argumentation semantics
- Fuzzy labelling semantics for quantitative argumentation
- Argumentative reasoning in ASPIC^+ under incomplete information
- Heuristic algorithms for credulous and sceptical reasoning problems in abstract argumentation
- An encoding of abstract dialectical frameworks into higher-order logic
- A tutorial in proof-theoretic approaches to logical argumentation
- A dialectical formalisation of preferred subtheories reasoning under resource bounds
- ICCMA 2023: 5th international competition on computational models of argumentation
- Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
- Forgetting in abstract argumentation: limits and possibilities
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks with preferences: partial orders and collective attacks
- Abstract argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints
- On generalized notions of consistency and reinstatement and their preservation in formal argumentation
- An abstract and structured account of dialectical argument strength
This page was built for publication:
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4585837)
