A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6136108
DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2023.103966MaRDI QIDQ6136108FDOQ6136108
Authors: Ofer Arieli, Annemarie Borg, Christian Straßer
Publication date: 28 August 2023
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
- The logic of paradox
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. I: The flat case
- What does a conditional knowledge base entail?
- Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen. II
- On the theory of inconsistent formal systems
- Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees'
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A logic for default reasoning
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Semi-stable semantics
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- Constraints for input/output logics
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Efficient reasoning about rich temporal domains
- Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
- Reasoning about truth
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
- Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
- How a Computer Should Think
- Closure and consistency in logic-associated argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Logical argumentation principles, sequents, and nondeterministic matrices
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the links between argumentation-based reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- Non-monotonic inference properties for assumption-based argumentation
- Theory of effective propositional paraconsistent logics
- On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
- Prioritized defaults and formal argumentation
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Deductive argumentation by enhanced sequent calculi and dynamic derivations
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Hypersequent-based argumentation: an instantiation in the relevance logic RM
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Reasoning with maximal consistency by argumentative approaches
- On the semantics of simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- Normative reasoning by sequent-based argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Logic-based approaches to formal argumentation
- Similarity measures between arguments revisited
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- Prioritized norms and defaults in formal argumentation
- A comparative study of assumption-based argumentative approaches to reasoning with priorities
- Assumptive sequent-based argumentation
This page was built for publication: A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6136108)