Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
From MaRDI portal
Publication:814510
DOI10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00076-6zbMATH Open1082.68819WikidataQ58168640 ScholiaQ58168640MaRDI QIDQ814510FDOQ814510
Authors: Paul E. Dunne, Trevor Bench-Capon
Publication date: 7 February 2006
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7599965
- Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
- Theory of disjunctive attacks, Part I
- Eight dialectic benchmarks discussed by two artificial localist disputors
Cites Work
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the computational complexity of assumption-based argumentation for default reasoning.
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems
- The Complexity of Propositional Proofs
- Lower bounds for cutting planes proofs with small coefficients
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
- The intractability of resolution
- Gentzen-type systems, resolution and tableaux
- The complexity of the pigeonhole principle
- An exponential separation between the parity principle and the pigeonhole principle
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Complexity of the Hajós Calculus
- Determining the Stability Number of a Graph
- The complexity of Gentzen systems for propositional logic
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
Cited In (19)
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- The computational complexity of ideal semantics
- Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks
- Self-stabilizing defeat status computation: dealing with conflict management in multi-agent systems
- A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation
- Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation
- Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
- Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments
- Audiences in argumentation frameworks
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- A puzzle about disputes and disagreements
- Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality
This page was built for publication: Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q814510)