Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2353912
DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2012.11.006zbMath1316.68204OpenAlexW1975279349MaRDI QIDQ2353912
Jordi Sabater-Mir, Isaac Pinyol
Publication date: 10 July 2015
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2012.11.006
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
- Modelling inference in argumentation through labelled deduction: formalization and logical properties
- An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
- Using probabilistic argumentation for key validation in public-key cryptography
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Review on computational trust and reputation models
- REPUTATION FOR INNOVATING SOCIAL NETWORKS
- Fuzzy Argumentation for Trust
- Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation
This page was built for publication: Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation