Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2012.11.006zbMath1316.68204OpenAlexW1975279349MaRDI QIDQ2353912

Jordi Sabater-Mir, Isaac Pinyol

Publication date: 10 July 2015

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2012.11.006

zbMATH Keywords

trustreliability measuresmultiagent systemsreputationargumentation-based protocol

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
• Modelling inference in argumentation through labelled deduction: formalization and logical properties
• An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
• Using probabilistic argumentation for key validation in public-key cryptography
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Review on computational trust and reputation models
• REPUTATION FOR INNOVATING SOCIAL NETWORKS
• Fuzzy Argumentation for Trust
• Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation

This page was built for publication: Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation