An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2006.06.014MaRDI QIDQ997053zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci

Publication date 19 July 2007

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationinformation merging

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1931646
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• Integration of weighted knowledge bases
• Solving conflicts in information merging by a flexible interpretation of atomic propositions

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1269569 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 592370 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1931646 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852916 (Why is no real title available?)
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
• Fusion of possibilistic knowledge bases from a postulate point of view.
• Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Integration of weighted knowledge bases
• On inference from inconsistent premisses
• On the Semantics of Arbitration
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information
• Using arguments for making and explaining decisions

Cited in

(15)

• Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation
• Argumentation-Supported Information Distribution in a Multiagent System for Knowledge Management
• Argumentation and inconsistency-tolerant reasoning
• Negotiation and persuasion among agents
• Solving conflicts in information merging by a flexible interpretation of atomic propositions
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1931646 (Why is no real title available?)
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Modelling Argument Accrual in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming
• Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• An equational approach to the merging of argumentation networks
• Measures of inconsistency and defaults
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems

This page was built for publication: An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q997053)