An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
From MaRDI portal
Publication:997053
DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.014zbMath1122.68116MaRDI QIDQ997053
Publication date: 19 July 2007
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)
Related Items
AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks, Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic, Solving conflicts in information merging by a flexible interpretation of atomic propositions, Measures of inconsistency and defaults, Modelling Argument Accrual in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming, Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation, Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
- Fusion of possibilistic knowledge bases from a postulate point of view.
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Integration of weighted knowledge bases
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- On the Semantics of Arbitration
