An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
From MaRDI portal
Publication:997053
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2006.06.014zbMATH Open1122.68116MaRDI QIDQ997053FDOQ997053
Authors: Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci 
Publication date: 19 July 2007
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information
- Integration of weighted knowledge bases
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Fusion of possibilistic knowledge bases from a postulate point of view.
- On the Semantics of Arbitration
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (15)
- An equational approach to the merging of argumentation networks
- Argumentation-Supported Information Distribution in a Multiagent System for Knowledge Management
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Modelling Argument Accrual in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Measures of inconsistency and defaults
- Arguing about social evaluations: from theory to experimentation
- Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
- Argumentation and inconsistency-tolerant reasoning
- Negotiation and persuasion among agents
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Solving conflicts in information merging by a flexible interpretation of atomic propositions
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
This page was built for publication: An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q997053)
