Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2008.11.006zbMATH Open1343.68219OpenAlexW2034735942MaRDI QIDQ835816FDOQ835816
Authors: Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade
Publication date: 31 August 2009
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006
Recommendations
- Decision making with assumption-based argumentation
- On the use of argumentation for multiple criteria decision making
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Decision theory (91B06) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)
Cites Work
- Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Reasoning about rational agents
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Weighted minimum and maximum operations in fuzzy set theory
- Two axiomatic approaches to decision making using possibility theory
- Argumentation machines. New frontiers in argument and computation.
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The logical foundations of goal-regression planning in autonomous agents
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An argument-based decision support system for assessing natural language usage on the basis of the web corpus
- Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue
Cited In (65)
- Goal-Driven Structured Argumentation for Patient Management in a Multimorbidity Setting
- Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
- Multi-criteria decision-making methods with optimism and pessimism based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets
- Explaining black-box classifiers: properties and functions
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- Gradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: making sense of fuzzy sets
- Argumentation framework based on evidence theory
- Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)
- Modelling the ``Laboratory of dilemmas: challenges and suggestions for argument-based decision making
- Abstract and concrete decision graphs for choosing extensions of argumentation frameworks
- Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Assumption-based argumentation for decision-making with preferences: a medical case study
- On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
- Argumentation based reinforcement learning for meta-knowledge extraction
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Lattice point of view for argumentation framework
- Preferential reducts and constructs in robust multiple criteria ranking and sorting
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- Revising option status in argument-based decision systems
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- Similarity measures based on compiled arguments
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
- Using possibilistic logic for modeling qualitative decision: answer set programming algorithms
- A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model
- An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
- \textsc{Electre-Score}: a first outranking based method for scoring actions
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- On the preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks: bijections with naive sets
- Argumentation-based preference modelling with incomplete information
- On the use of argumentation for multiple criteria decision making
- Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer Set Programming
- Bivariate models of optimism and pessimism in multi-criteria decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- A formal framework for deliberated judgment
- A practical account into counting Dung's extensions by dynamic programming
- Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
- Argumentation theory and decision aiding
- Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
- Assumption-Based Argumentation for Selection and Composition of Services
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- A possibilistic argumentation decision making framework with default reasoning
- Parameterized Complexity of Logic-based Argumentation in Schaefer’s Framework
- Argumentation based dynamic multiple criteria decision making
- Decision making with assumption-based argumentation
- Partial semantics of argumentation
- Questionable stepwise explanations for a robust additive preference model
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- A framework for inherently interpretable optimization models
- Argumentation and inconsistency-tolerant reasoning
- Negotiation and persuasion among agents
- Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- Fuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentation
- Evidence-based argumentation and its incremental semantics
- On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q835816)