Using arguments for making and explaining decisions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:835816


DOI10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006zbMath1343.68219MaRDI QIDQ835816

Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud

Publication date: 31 August 2009

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006


91B06: Decision theory

68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence

68T20: Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.)


Related Items

Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks, Equivalence in logic-based argumentation, Argumentation Framework Based on Evidence Theory, Multi-criteria decision-making methods with optimism and pessimism based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs, Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation), Preferences in artificial intelligence, An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems, Gradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: making sense of fuzzy sets, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, Preferential reducts and constructs in robust multiple criteria ranking and sorting, Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics, Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks, Bivariate models of optimism and pessimism in multi-criteria decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model, Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method, A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks, An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases, Classical logic, argument and dialectic, On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation, Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations, A formal framework for deliberated judgment, Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks, Using possibilistic logic for modeling qualitative decision: answer set programming algorithms, Argumentation based reinforcement learning for meta-knowledge extraction, Partial Semantics of Argumentation, On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks, On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems



Cites Work