Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2105593
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2022.10.009zbMATH Open1505.68040OpenAlexW4306812360MaRDI QIDQ2105593FDOQ2105593
Authors: Lixing Tan, Zhaohui Zhu, Jinjin Zhang, Fu Jun Wang 
Publication date: 8 December 2022
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.10.009
Recommendations
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Continuous Lattices and Domains
- On a generalization of quantifiers
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Semi-stable semantics
- Looking-ahead in backtracking algorithms for abstract argumentation
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Algorithms for argumentation semantics: labeling attacks as a generalization of labeling arguments
- Argument based machine learning
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An approach to characterize graded entailment of arguments through a label-based framework
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- Parametric properties of ideal semantics
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Design and results of the second international competition on computational models of argumentation
- How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained
- Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
- A Labelling Semantics and Strong Admissibility for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
Cited In (12)
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- An AIF-based labeled argumentation framework
- Intertranslatability of labeling-based argumentation semantics
- Computing preferred labellings by exploiting SCCs and most sceptically rejected arguments
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- Ranking functions over labelings
- Probabilistic graded semantics
- Algorithms for argumentation semantics: labeling attacks as a generalization of labeling arguments
- A first approach to argumentation label functions
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- A labeled argumentation framework
This page was built for publication: Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2105593)
