An approach to characterize graded entailment of arguments through a label-based framework

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2016.12.016zbMATH Open1404.68151arXiv1903.01865OpenAlexW2562216120MaRDI QIDQ511660

Guillermo R. Simari, Ignacio D. Viglizzo, Gerardo Simari, Maximiliano C. D. Budán

Publication date: 22 February 2017

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Argumentation theory is a powerful paradigm that formalizes a type of commonsense reasoning that aims to simulate the human ability to resolve a specific problem in an intelligent manner. A classical argumentation process takes into account only the properties related to the intrinsic logical soundness of an argument in order to determine its acceptability status. However, these properties are not always the only ones that matter to establish the argument's acceptability---there exist other qualities, such as strength, weight, social votes, trust degree, relevance level, and certainty degree, among others.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01865

zbMATH Keywords

uncertain reasoningargumentation systemsfuzzy valuations range

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming
• Fuzzy sets
• ENTROPY AND SPECIFICITY IN A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EVIDENCE
• Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Polynomial algorithms in linear programming
• Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: A survey of theory, algorithms and applications
• Many valued topology and its applications
• A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
• Probabilistic argumentation systems
• A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation
• On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• A CLASS OF FUZZY MEASURES BASED ON TRIANGULAR NORMS A general framework for the combination of uncertain information
• A review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• Fuzzy Argumentation for Trust
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Formalizing argumentative reasoning in a possibilistic logic programming setting with fuzzy unification
• A Numerical Approach to the Merging of Argumentation Networks
• Fuzzy argumentation system for decision support
• Modelling argument accrual with possibilistic uncertainty in a logic programming setting
• On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format
• Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
• Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
• Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
• SOFSEM 2004: Theory and Practice of Computer Science
• A labeled argumentation framework
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (3)

• Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
• Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
• Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles

This page was built for publication: An approach to characterize graded entailment of arguments through a label-based framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q511660)