A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation
DOI10.1007/S10472-015-9476-4zbMATH Open1356.68224OpenAlexW2175917793MaRDI QIDQ287765
Paulo Shakarian, Gerardo Simari, Marcelo A. Falappa
Publication date: 23 May 2016
Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9476-4
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Knowledge representation (68T30) Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35) Logic programming (68N17) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Probabilistic logic
- Markov logic networks
- On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change
- The independent choice logic for modelling multiple agents under uncertainty
- A logic for reasoning about probabilities
- Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning.
- Query answering under probabilistic uncertainty in Datalog\(+/-\) ontologies
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Computing most probable worlds of action probabilistic logic programs: scalable estimation for \(10^{30,000}\) worlds
- Probabilistic argumentation systems
- On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Semi-revision
- Computing Generalized Specificity
- Kernel contraction
- A series of revisions of David Poole's specificity
- Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
- Belief Revision in Structured Probabilistic Argumentation
- A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
Cited In (4)
- Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- An approach to characterize graded entailment of arguments through a label-based framework
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q287765)
