Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4989339
Recommendations
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- A labeled argumentation framework
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Hybrid reasoning on a bipolar argumentation framework
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Bipolar argumentation frameworks, modal logic and semantic paradoxes
- Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation
Cited in
(11)- Enhancing statement evaluation in argumentation via multi-labelling systems
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- An AIF-based labeled argumentation framework
- On labelling statements in multi-labeling argumentation
- On the study of acceptability in weighted argumentation frameworks through four-state labelling semantics
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- An approach to characterize graded entailment of arguments through a label-based framework
- A labeled argumentation framework
- Hybrid reasoning on a bipolar argumentation framework
This page was built for publication: Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4989339)