On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1002/int.20307zbMath1151.68049OpenAlexW4213419683MaRDI QIDQ3537543

Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Claudette Cayrol, Leila Amgoud, Pierre Livet

Publication date: 7 November 2008

Published in: International Journal of Intelligent Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.138.52

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20)

Related Items (36)

Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees ⋮ Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues ⋮ Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks ⋮ Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs ⋮ Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis ⋮ Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks ⋮ Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation ⋮ Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks ⋮ An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support ⋮ A filtering-based general approach to learning rational constraints of epistemic graphs ⋮ An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference ⋮ Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks ⋮ Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework ⋮ Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties ⋮ On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks ⋮ From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum ⋮ Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches ⋮ Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework ⋮ Open-Mindedness of Gradual Argumentation Semantics ⋮ On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics ⋮ Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation ⋮ Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation ⋮ Lattices of fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy sets, and mathematical morphology ⋮ Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques ⋮ Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding ⋮ Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view ⋮ A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation ⋮ Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments ⋮ Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding

Cites Work

• Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
• A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
• Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system
• Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification

This page was built for publication: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks