On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3537543
Recommendations
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Cites work
- A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
- A formal framework for handling conflicting desires
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system
- Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
Cited in
(43)- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks: grounded semantics and principles
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- A filtering-based general approach to learning rational constraints of epistemic graphs
- Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
- Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
- Lattices of fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy sets, and mathematical morphology
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Two routes for bipolar information processing, and a blind spot in between
- On the decomposition of abstract dialectical frameworks and the complexity of naive-based semantics
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- Argumentation theory and decision aiding
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- Hybrid reasoning on a bipolar argumentation framework
- Open-mindedness of gradual argumentation semantics
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
This page was built for publication: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3537543)
