On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3537543
DOI10.1002/INT.20307zbMATH Open1151.68049OpenAlexW4213419683MaRDI QIDQ3537543
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Claudette Cayrol, Leila Amgoud, Pierre Livet
Publication date: 7 November 2008
Published in: International Journal of Intelligent Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.138.52
Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Knowledge representation (68T30)
Cites Work
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
- A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Cited In (38)
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding
- Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework
- Open-Mindedness of Gradual Argumentation Semantics
- Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis
- Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks: grounded semantics and principles
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- A filtering-based general approach to learning rational constraints of epistemic graphs
- On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics
- Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
- Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
- Lattices of fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy sets, and mathematical morphology
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks
This page was built for publication: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3537543)
