On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3537543
DOI10.1002/INT.20307zbMATH Open1151.68049OpenAlexW4213419683MaRDI QIDQ3537543FDOQ3537543
Authors: Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Pierre Livet 
Publication date: 7 November 2008
Published in: International Journal of Intelligent Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.138.52
Recommendations
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Knowledge representation (68T30)
Cites Work
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- A formal framework for handling conflicting desires
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
- A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Cited In (43)
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis
- Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks: grounded semantics and principles
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- A filtering-based general approach to learning rational constraints of epistemic graphs
- Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
- Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
- Lattices of fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy sets, and mathematical morphology
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Two routes for bipolar information processing, and a blind spot in between
- On the decomposition of abstract dialectical frameworks and the complexity of naive-based semantics
- Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- Argumentation theory and decision aiding
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- Hybrid reasoning on a bipolar argumentation framework
- Open-mindedness of gradual argumentation semantics
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks
This page was built for publication: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3537543)
