Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_9zbMath1203.68198WikidataQ57499574 ScholiaQ57499574MaRDI QIDQ3638140

Pietro Baroni, Giovanni Guida, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin

Publication date: 2 July 2009

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_9

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B06: Decision theory

68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence

Related Items

On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks, Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results, On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance, AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks, Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties, An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support, Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems, Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation, Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations, A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks, Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation, Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger, Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications, Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview, Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques, Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning