Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:835836
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001zbMath1192.68663OpenAlexW1966873207MaRDI QIDQ835836
Publication date: 31 August 2009
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001
Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic programming (68N17)
Related Items
Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees ⋮ An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies ⋮ Preferences in artificial intelligence ⋮ Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter ⋮ Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation ⋮ RAFDivider : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation ⋮ Global view on reactivity: switch graphs and their logics ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger ⋮ An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support ⋮ Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks ⋮ Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments ⋮ Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks ⋮ A multi attack argumentation framework ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates ⋮ Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties ⋮ A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model ⋮ Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method ⋮ A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making ⋮ On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks ⋮ Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems ⋮ Revision of defeasible preferences ⋮ On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach ⋮ Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks ⋮ Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation ⋮ Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ Backing and Undercutting in Defeasible Logic Programming ⋮ Arguing with Valued Preference Relations ⋮ Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework ⋮ Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results ⋮ On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance ⋮ Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview ⋮ Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques ⋮ Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs ⋮ Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks ⋮ Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences ⋮ A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework ⋮ Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence ⋮ On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation ⋮ On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks ⋮ Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey ⋮ Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding ⋮ Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Computational representation of practical argument
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actions
- On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- AI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
