Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:835836
DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2009.02.001zbMATH Open1192.68663OpenAlexW1966873207MaRDI QIDQ835836FDOQ835836
Authors: Sanjay Modgil 
Publication date: 31 August 2009
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001
Recommendations
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- On the interaction between logic and preference in structured argumentation
- Preference-based argumentation built from prioritized logic programming
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic programming (68N17) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actions
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- A formal framework for handling conflicting desires
- On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Computational representation of practical argument
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Argumentative agent deliberation, roles and context
- AI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Cited In (75)
- Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
- A multi attack argumentation framework
- Revision of defeasible preferences
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- AI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
- Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework
- Backing and undercutting in defeasible logic programming
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
- Metalevel argumentation
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
- On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
- Global view on reactivity: switch graphs and their logics
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model
- Preference-based argumentation built from prioritized logic programming
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- A General Framework for Expressing Preferences in Causal Reasoning and Planning
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
- Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
- Understanding the abstract dialectical framework
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
- Reduction-based approaches to implement Modgil's extended argumentation frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
- Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments
- RAFDivider : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks
- An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
- Preference Handling for Belief-Based Rational Decisions
- The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation
- On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks
- A comparative study of assumption-based argumentative approaches to reasoning with priorities
- Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
This page was built for publication: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q835836)
