A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:766045
DOI10.1007/S10472-011-9271-9zbMATH Open1234.68371OpenAlexW2054530127MaRDI QIDQ766045FDOQ766045
Authors: Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic 
Publication date: 22 March 2012
Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-011-9271-9
Recommendations
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Knowledge representation (68T30)
Cites Work
- How to reason defeasibly
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- A General Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
- Argument based machine learning
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Arguing and Explaining Classifications
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs
Cited In (24)
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
- Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
- Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework
- Solving weighted argumentation frameworks with soft constraints
- Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Five Weaknesses of ASPIC +
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation
- On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic
- On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Beyond Maxi-Consistent Argumentation Operators
- On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q766045)
