Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2915089
Recommendations
- Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Theory of semi-instantiation in abstract argumentation
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3078997 (Why is no real title available?)
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- On the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency values
Cited in
(9)- Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Reasoning with maximal consistency by argumentative approaches
- Reinstatement and the Requirement of Maximal Specificity in Argument Systems
This page was built for publication: Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2915089)