On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1028948
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.004zbMath1168.68559OpenAlexW2118090719WikidataQ57499580 ScholiaQ57499580MaRDI QIDQ1028948
Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
Publication date: 9 July 2009
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.004
Related Items
On Supported Inference and Extension Selection in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Formulating Semantics of Probabilistic Argumentation by Characterizing Subgraphs ⋮ Beyond Maxi-Consistent Argumentation Operators ⋮ On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics ⋮ Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility ⋮ Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks ⋮ Toward incremental computation of argumentation semantics: a decomposition-based approach ⋮ Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement ⋮ Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation ⋮ Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules ⋮ Static and dynamic orderings on Dungean argumentation frameworks -- an overview ⋮ A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness ⋮ A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison ⋮ Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation ⋮ Paracoherent Answer Set Semantics meets Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory ⋮ Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks ⋮ Collective argumentation with topological restrictions ⋮ The choice-preferred semantics for relevance-oriented acceptance of admissible sets of arguments ⋮ New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation ⋮ Towards a general theory of decomposability in abstract argumentation ⋮ The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation ⋮ A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory ⋮ Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism ⋮ Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method ⋮ On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks ⋮ Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks ⋮ An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation ⋮ On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method ⋮ Dynamics of knowledge in D<scp>e</scp>LP through Argument Theory Change ⋮ Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability ⋮ A Dynamic Approach for Combining Abstract Argumentation Semantics ⋮ Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases ⋮ Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics Based on Conflict-Free Sets ⋮ Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources ⋮ A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application ⋮ Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai ⋮ Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics ⋮ I don’t care, I don’t know … I know too much! On Incompleteness and Undecidedness in Abstract Argumentation ⋮ Judgment Aggregation in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ⋮ What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics? ⋮ Open Problems in Abstract Argumentation ⋮ On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance ⋮ Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques ⋮ A logical account of formal argumentation ⋮ Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms ⋮ Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ A formal framework for deliberated judgment ⋮ Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension ⋮ Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments ⋮ Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics ⋮ Partial Semantics of Argumentation ⋮ Encoding Argument Graphs in Logic ⋮ Argumentation in artificial intelligence ⋮ On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics ⋮ Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation ⋮ A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey ⋮ Indepth combinatorial analysis of admissible sets for abstract argumentation
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- A logic for default reasoning
- How to reason defeasibly
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Skepticism and floating conclusions
