A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6066787
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011OpenAlexW4386517816MaRDI QIDQ6066787
Stefan Woltran, Anna Rapberger, Wolfgang Dvořák
Publication date: 16 November 2023
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011
expressivenessargumentation semanticsprinciple-based analysisclaim-augmented argumentation frameworksclaim-based reasoning
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- A logic for default reasoning
- On the partial semantics for disjunctive deductive databases
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets
- The refinement extension principle for semantics of dynamic logic programming
- Semi-stable semantics
- Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
- Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
- Deterministic and non-deterministic stable models
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the Relation Between Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks and Collective Attacks
- Enhancing Statement Evaluation in Argumentation via Multi-labelling Systems
- On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Skepticism and floating conclusions
- The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness