Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:465599
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2013.10.004zbMATH Open1433.68438OpenAlexW1988062200MaRDI QIDQ465599FDOQ465599
Authors: Leila Amgoud 
Publication date: 23 October 2014
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004
Recommendations
- Closure and consistency rationalities in logic-based argumentation
- Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Knowledge representation (68T30) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- How to reason defeasibly
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Argumentation-based reinforcement learning for RoboCup soccer Keepaway
- Towards a Formal Framework for the Search of a Consensus Between Autonomous Agents
Cited In (23)
- A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Correct grounded reasoning with presumptive arguments
- Closure and consistency rationalities in logic-based argumentation
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- Opposition Frameworks
- An argumentation system for reasoning with LPm
- Closure and consistency in logic-associated argumentation
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- On argumentation logic and propositional logic
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q465599)
