Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4659505
DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/14.5.675zbMATH Open1067.03038OpenAlexW2142953387WikidataQ58177112 ScholiaQ58177112MaRDI QIDQ4659505FDOQ4659505
Authors: Guido Governatori, Michael J. Maher, Grigoris Antoniou, David Billington 
Publication date: 21 March 2005
Published in: Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/14.5.675
Recommendations
Cited In (54)
- Stable normative explanations: from argumentation to deontic logic
- Revision of defeasible preferences
- Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis
- Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
- How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An inclusion theorem for defeasible logics
- A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Changing Legal Systems: Abrogation and Annulment Part I: Revision of Defeasible Theories
- The foundations of DeLP: Defeating relations, games and truth values
- Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning
- Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
- Justifying answer sets using argumentation
- A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
- A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Hypersequent-based argumentation: an instantiation in the relevance logic RM
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Temporal Deontic Defeasible Logic: An Analytical Approach
- Generic logical encoding for argumentation
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory
- Similarity measures based on compiled arguments
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Local logics, non-monotonicity and defeasible argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- DEFEASIBLE REASONING IN WEB-BASED FORMS THROUGH ARGUMENTATION
- Relating concrete defeasible reasoning formalisms and abstract argumentation
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Enabling reasoning with LegalRuleML
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Well-founded semantics for defeasible logic
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
- Practical Normative Reasoning with Defeasible Deontic Logic
- Towards an Extensible Argumentation System
- Interdefinability of defeasible logic and logic programming under the well-founded semantics
- Argument graphs for defeasible logic programming
- Large-scale parallel stratified defeasible reasoning
- A First Order Logic Benchmark for Defeasible Reasoning Tool Profiling
- Annotated defeasible logic
- Inference to the stable explanations
- Formal Definitions of Reason Fallacies to Aid Defect Exploration in Argument Gaming
- Towards Context Sensitive Defeasible Rules
This page was built for publication: Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4659505)
