A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities. Due to a variety of interests, probabilistic argumentation is approached in the literature with different frameworks, pertaining to structured and abstract argumentation, and with respect to diverse types of uncertainty, in particular the uncertainty on the credibility of the premises, the uncertainty about which arguments to consider, and the uncertainty on the acceptance status of arguments or statements. Towards a general framework for probabilistic argumentation, we investigate a labelling-oriented framework encompassing a basic setting for rule-based argumentation and its (semi-) abstract account, along with diverse types of uncertainty. Our framework provides a systematic treatment of various kinds of uncertainty and of their relationships and allows us to back or question assertions from the literature.
Recommendations
- A labeled argumentation framework
- Toward a computational analysis of probabilistic argumentation frameworks
- An AIF-based labeled argumentation framework
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- On labelling statements in multi-labeling argumentation
- Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48344 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3514748 (Why is no real title available?)
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- CHR(PRISM)-based probabilistic logic learning
- Closure and consistency in logic-associated argumentation
- Constraint Handling Rules
- Explaining Bayesian networks using argumentation
- Formulating semantics of probabilistic argumentation by characterizing subgraphs
- Formulating semantics of probabilistic argumentation by characterizing subgraphs: theory and empirical results
- Jumping to conclusions. A logico-probabilistic foundation for defeasible rule-based arguments
- Justification and defeat
- Norms and learning in probabilistic logic-based agents
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- On labelling statements in multi-labeling argumentation
- On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
- Probabilistic argumentation
- Probabilistic argumentation: an equational approach
- Probabilistic legal reasoning in CHRiSM
- Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Set Theory
- Toward a computational analysis of probabilistic argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(6)- Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework
- On searching explanatory argumentation graphs
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- A labeled argumentation framework
This page was built for publication: A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q722102)
