Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.001zbMath1316.68152OpenAlexW2071549077MaRDI QIDQ2353924

Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex

Publication date: 10 July 2015

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.001

zbMATH Keywords

argumentation theorybipolarity in argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items

Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving, Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks, Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks, Foundations for a logic of arguments, Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation, Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks, Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic, Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks, A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework, Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations, Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches, On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach, Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities, A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation, A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application, Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs, A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation, Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling, A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation, Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments, Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework, On searching explanatory argumentation graphs, On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Argue to agree: a case-based argumentation approach
• A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
• Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system