Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation

DOI10.1007/s10472-012-9317-7zbMath1280.68255WikidataQ110528559 ScholiaQ110528559MaRDI QIDQ1935594

Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata, Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay

Publication date: 18 February 2013

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/14507

zbMATH Keywords

modelling; deductive support; defeasible support; prioritized support

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

68T30: Knowledge representation

68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence

68T42: Agent technology and artificial intelligence

Related Items

Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation, On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach, An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support, Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations, A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation, Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks, Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• An argumentation framework in default logic
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
• Fibring argumentation frames
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources
• Metalevel argumentation
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks