Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1935594
DOI10.1007/s10472-012-9317-7zbMath1280.68255WikidataQ110528559 ScholiaQ110528559MaRDI QIDQ1935594
Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata, Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay
Publication date: 18 February 2013
Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/14507
68T30: Knowledge representation
68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence
68T42: Agent technology and artificial intelligence
Related Items
Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation, On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach, An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support, Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations, A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation, Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks, Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An argumentation framework in default logic
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- Fibring argumentation frames
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources
- Metalevel argumentation
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks