On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks

DOI10.1016/j.entcs.2019.07.002zbMath1433.68415OpenAlexW2969630225WikidataQ113317463 ScholiaQ113317463MaRDI QIDQ2333663

Samy Sá, João Alcântara

Publication date: 13 November 2019

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2019.07.002

zbMATH Keywords

uncertaintyknowledge representationargumentationabstract dialectical frameworksargument labellings

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Knowledge representation (68T30)

Uses Software

• OSCAR

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• How to reason defeasibly
• Abstract argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A logical account of formal argumentation
• On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks