Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4444968
DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/13.3.429zbMATH Open1043.03026OpenAlexW2116246756WikidataQ58168625 ScholiaQ58168625MaRDI QIDQ4444968FDOQ4444968
Authors: Trevor Bench-Capon 
Publication date: 28 January 2004
Published in: Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.429
Recommendations
Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cited In (only showing first 100 items - show all)
- A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies
- Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition
- A multi attack argumentation framework
- Remedial interchange, contrary-to-duty obligation and commutation
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
- Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
- AI*IA 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- On the value of persuasion by experts
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
- Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
- Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Persuasive argumentation and epistemic attitudes
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
- Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning
- Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- Computational representation of practical argument
- Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
- On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
- On the decomposition of abstract dialectical frameworks and the complexity of naive-based semantics
- A relaxation of internal conflict and defence in weighted argumentation frameworks
- Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- Algorithms and complexity results for persuasive argumentation
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Audiences in argumentation frameworks
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
- Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality
- Getting consensus through a context-based argumentation framework
- Reduction-based approaches to implement Modgil's extended argumentation frameworks
- Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
- A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II)
- A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Information
- Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
- Value-based argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A parametrized ranking-based semantics for persuasion
- Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
- A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
- Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
- Five weaknesses of ASPIC\(^+\)
- A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
- On \(\mathcal{F} \)-systems: a graph-theoretic model for paradoxes involving a falsity predicate and its application to argumentation frameworks
- A Cooperative Approach for Composite Ontology Mapping
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments
- Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
- On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust
- Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues
- The degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentation
- Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
- Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
- What is a reasonable argumentation semantics?
- A comprehensive account of the burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation
- A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part I)
- Opposition Frameworks
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Towards an Extensible Argumentation System
- Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4444968)
