Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4444968
DOI10.1093/logcom/13.3.429zbMath1043.03026OpenAlexW2116246756WikidataQ58168625 ScholiaQ58168625MaRDI QIDQ4444968
Publication date: 28 January 2004
Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.429
Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)
Related Items
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks, Preferences in artificial intelligence, Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack, Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues, The degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentation, Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation, Computational representation of practical argument, A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies, An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems, Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks, Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach, Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter, Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation, Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation, On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument, A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation, Blending under deconstruction. The roles of logic, ontology, and cognition in computational concept invention, AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks, Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning, Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses, Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities, Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective, An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities, On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks, Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger, Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks, On \(\mathcal{F} \)-systems: a graph-theoretic model for paradoxes involving a falsity predicate and its application to argumentation frameworks, Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments, Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games, The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation, Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation, A multi attack argumentation framework, On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments, Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation, Towards an Extensible Argumentation System, An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences, Classical logic, argument and dialectic, Unnamed Item, Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates, Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties, Algorithms and complexity results for persuasive argumentation, A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making, Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Information, Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents, A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part I), A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II), Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning, On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics, Evaluating practical reasoning, Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics, Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications, Arguing with Valued Preference Relations, Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks, Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems, A Metamathematical Model for A/O Opposition in Scientific Inquiry, Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks, What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?, Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results, On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance, Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques, Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values, Strategic Agent Communication: An Argumentation-Driven Approach, Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs, A Cooperative Approach for Composite Ontology Mapping, Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future, Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view, A formal framework for deliberated judgment, On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust, Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality, Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence, Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics, Remedial interchange, contrary-to-duty obligation and commutation, Audiences in argumentation frameworks, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Argumentation in artificial intelligence, On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics, Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints, On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems, Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems, Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation, A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks, A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions, A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks, Opposition Frameworks, Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework, Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence, Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks, On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation, A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments, Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey, Five Weaknesses of ASPIC +, Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding, Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks, Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
