Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4444968
Recommendations
Cited in
(only showing first 100 items - show all)- A multi attack argumentation framework
- Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
- A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies
- Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
- Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
- An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
- Persuasive argumentation and epistemic attitudes
- Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
- On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
- A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- On the decomposition of abstract dialectical frameworks and the complexity of naive-based semantics
- A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
- Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
- Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality
- Audiences in argumentation frameworks
- Algorithms and complexity results for persuasive argumentation
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Remedial interchange, contrary-to-duty obligation and commutation
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- A relaxation of internal conflict and defence in weighted argumentation frameworks
- On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition
- Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Argumentation for practical reasoning: an axiomatic approach
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
- On the value of persuasion by experts
- Preferences in artificial intelligence
- Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
- Computational representation of practical argument
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- AI*IA 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- A Cooperative Approach for Composite Ontology Mapping
- Value-based argumentation
- A parametrized ranking-based semantics for persuasion
- Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
- Towards an Extensible Argumentation System
- Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?
- Five weaknesses of ASPIC\(^+\)
- Getting consensus through a context-based argumentation framework
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
- Reduction-based approaches to implement Modgil's extended argumentation frameworks
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Strategic Agent Communication: An Argumentation-Driven Approach
- Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
- Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
- Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments
- Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
- What is a reasonable argumentation semantics?
- On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust
- Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry
- A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
- A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II)
- A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Information
- Blending under deconstruction. The roles of logic, ontology, and cognition in computational concept invention
- A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation
- On \(\mathcal{F} \)-systems: a graph-theoretic model for paradoxes involving a falsity predicate and its application to argumentation frameworks
- Understanding the abstract dialectical framework
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7450036 (Why is no real title available?)
- Evaluating practical reasoning
- Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues
This page was built for publication: Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4444968)
