Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1016/J.JAL.2015.03.005zbMATH Open1394.68363OpenAlexW2023831180MaRDI QIDQ901144FDOQ901144

Authors: Ofer Arieli 

Publication date: 23 December 2015

Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.03.005

Recommendations

• Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
• On the acceptance of loops in argumentation frameworks
• Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• On the semantics of simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks

zbMATH Keywords

constraint satisfactionabstract argumentationfour-valued semanticsthree-valued semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Many-valued logic (03B50) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the theory of inconsistent formal systems
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
• The value of the four values
• Natural 3-valued logics—characterization and proof theory
• A logic for default reasoning
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A logical account of formal argumentation
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
• A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Paraconsistent reasoning and preferential entailments by signed quantified Boolean formulae
• Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks

Cited In (7)

• Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
• A brief introduction to the Shkop approach to conflict resolution in formal argumentation
• Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
• Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
• A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
• On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
• Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems

This page was built for publication: Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q901144)