Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6579305
DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2024.104159zbMATH Open1543.6835MaRDI QIDQ6579305FDOQ6579305
Authors: Gianvincenzo Alfano, Andrea Cohen, Sebastian Gottifredi, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi, Guillermo R. Simari 
Publication date: 25 July 2024
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
formal argumentationincremental computationabstract argumentationhigh-order interactionscredulous acceptanceargumentation dynamics
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Splitting an Argumentation Framework
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation
- Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- Toward incremental computation of argumentation semantics: a decomposition-based approach
- Preference in Abstract Argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Partial semantics of argumentation: basic properties and empirical
- Approximations for the maximum acyclic subgraph problem
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
- Structure-based semantics of argumentation frameworks with higher-order attacks and supports
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Extended explanatory argumentation frameworks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation
- Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
- Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- The matrix approach for abstract argumentation frameworks
- Revising option status in argument-based decision systems
- On the incremental computation of semantics in dynamic argumentation
- Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6579305)
