A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments

DOI10.1023/A:1014490210693zbMATH Open1002.68172OpenAlexW2171853123MaRDI QIDQ1601892FDOQ1601892

Authors: Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol 

Publication date: 27 June 2002

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693

Recommendations

• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
• On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationpreference relations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Cited In (85)

• Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
• Algorithms for Effective Argumentation in Classical Propositional Logic: A Connection Graph Approach
• How Dirty Is Your Relational Database? An Axiomatic Approach
• On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
• Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence
• Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
• Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework
• Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework
• The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
• Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture
• Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
• On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
• Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach
• An Algorithm for Generating Arguments in Classical Predicate Logic
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
• On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics
• Preferences in artificial intelligence
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• Intrinsic argument strength in structured argumentation: a principled approach
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach
• Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• Probabilistic argumentation
• On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
• Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
• Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
• On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
• Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
• Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments
• Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
• Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
• Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae
• On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness
• Audiences in argumentation frameworks
• Where logic and agents meet
• Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
• On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
• Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems
• Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic
• A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
• Policy-based inconsistency management in relational databases
• Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
• Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality
• Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
• Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
• Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
• Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
• A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry
• Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks: grounded semantics and principles
• A propositional logical encoding of enriched interactions in abstract argumentation graphs
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation
• How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation
• Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust
• A formal framework for deliberated judgment
• Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation
• Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
• Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
• Towards Context Sensitive Defeasible Rules
• Title not available (Why is that?)

This page was built for publication: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1601892)