On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-60438-1_20zbMath1461.68222OpenAlexW2626178658MaRDI QIDQ3388212

Stefano Ferilli, Andrea Pazienza, Floriana Esposito

Publication date: 5 May 2021

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60438-1_20

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Computing methodologies for information systems (hypertext navigation, interfaces, decision support, etc.) (68U35)

Related Items (2)

Taking into account ``who said what in abstract argumentation: complexity results ⋮ On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust

Cites Work

• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: On the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of Trust