Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
This paper develops a formalism that combines actions, values and argumentation to model policy-making agents. It focuses on the description of a value-based agent specification and on the mechanisms that integrate defeasible argumentation into the agent reasoning process. In the proposed approach, agents look for achieving a state of the world by a plan of actions starting from a given specific situation. It discusses how the agent can represent its values and uses this representation to decide among the possible action plans. An argumentation-based development is employed to analyze how actions lead to transactions from one state to another. The agent's knowledge is represented by a defeasible logic programming. Neither the values nor the preferences according are not measured but only ordered. A framework is set with the agent values initially ordered in a hierarchy and rules to compare the action plans explore such ordering.
- A formal framework for handling conflicting desires
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks
- Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation
- Computational representation of practical argument
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Defeasible Reasoning and Partial Order Planning
- Handbook of Computational Social Choice
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1531964 (Why is no real title available?)
- Manipulation of social choice functions
- On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
- Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning
- An approach to improve argumentation-based epistemic planning with contextual preferences
- An approach for combining ethical principles with public opinion to guide public policy
- Synthesis and Properties of Optimally Value-Aligned Normative Systems
- Argument schemes for normative practical reasoning
- Taking principles seriously: a hybrid approach to value alignment in artificial intelligence
- Advanced intelligent systems and reasoning: standardization, experimentation, explanation
- Plan selection framework for policy-aware autonomous agents
This page was built for publication: Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2294587)
