Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_9MaRDI QIDQ6587910FDOQ6587910

Dragan Doder, Saul Gebhardt

Publication date: 15 August 2024

zbMATH Keywords

preferencesabstract argumentationDung's semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Preference in Abstract Argumentation
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6587910)